If you haven’t voted yet…..Ask yourself this about the 2011 SEBAC Agreement…..If I knew for a fact that I wouldn’t be layed off would I vote for this package?
I believe that the total “Yes” count would be limited to that of those who knew they were getting layed off. So if 7500 were going to be layed off…there would be 7500 “yes” votes. The only factor in this is the FEAR FACTOR”…”will it be me”?
There aren’t too many ways to say this but the agreement “sucks”. There is nothing good in it for any State Employee apart from the “sort of” guaranteed job security for 4 years….layoffs can still happen by consolidation and department elimination.
My reasons for voting NO!
1. No established health care plan is present….a framework… but no actual plan. The only plans we’re lead to go by expire July 1, 2011…open enrollment was canceled….there is not a plan booklet out for this year. Anthem, United/Oxford ,or the State Comptrollers office can not give you a contract plan that actually states that it applies to after June of this year. Also…do not forget …contracts with Anthem and United/Oxford expire June 30, 2012. Premiums, copays can rise significantly, and treatments covered, and diagnostic tests (not preventative) paid for can be changed…you’re really only guaranteed your plan won’t change at all this year. Voting Yes allows the State to get “very creative” with your benefits, and not necessarliy in a good way for you!
2. If you’re a tier 2 or 2A, retiring after 2022, and decide to pay into your pension to maintain “normal” retirement age….there is no legal protection or language built into the 2011 Agreement that says what happens to the money you invest should the State legislatively change (to a 401k type plan) or eliminate pensions altogether in 2022 ( or even before). Yes, we would be able to file a lawsuit if they did this….BUT…if you want to retire…. do you want to wait another 10 years for your money? Or have to agree to a settlement?
3. Will we get that last 3% salary increase? This Agreement has us agree to give back the increases bargained for in 2009….why should we believe that last 3% increase will be given, especially when Patrice Peterson called it a “Bargaining chip for next time” in a union info session!
….and I question how clear their motivations were in bargaining our interests . Were they more interested in benefitting their philosophical/political alignments? and forwarding the interests of the charitible organizations some represent?
again ask yourself…
Would I vote for this agreement if I knew I wasn’t going to get layed off?
Good Luck…vote safely!
Filed under: Uncategorized, 2011 SEBAC Agreement | Tagged: life, connecticut state employees, sustinet, SEBAC Agreement, 2011 sebac agreement, sebac voting, HEP plan, healthcare pooling ct., sebac tentative agreement | 1 Comment »